Albert Burgess

 

 

Your Ref SOLS/DMG/Constitution
Dear Daniel What you choose to call political I call law; you are a qualified solicitor and have studied the Administrative and public laws of England. I on the other hand was a trained and experienced police officer.  As you were getting your degree I was retiring.  As an academic lawyer you refer to the law as it is written it matters not to you if the law is good or bad, you content yourself that it was made by parliament. As a police officer I deal with law at the sharp end, not for me the luxury of consulting a book before coming to a decision I must know the law so well that I must reach a decision within minutes and the only library of law available to me is the one I carry in my head, and unlike the lawyer who gets it wrong and shrugs his shoulders and walks away, if the police officer gets it wrong we end up with a riot on our hands, this is particularly true when dealing with our coloured brothers.

I am more interested in the spirit than the letter of the law, the reason for that being that I am charged with keeping the Queens Peace and the best way of doing that is to apply the law fairly and in accordance with the principles laid down by our very wise forefathers in the Constitutional and Common Law of England. In short I policed with a kind word and a smile, not once in my career did I ever consider using my truncheon. 

 

Chief Justice Stonor of the Kings Bench in 1345 ruled that law is that which is right. It is not right to destroy the Constitutional arrangements of Parliament by destroying the House of Lords. And that is what is happening before our eyes; to destroy the checks and balances put in place in Parliament to prevent despotic government really does constitute the Major Crime of High Treason against the English Constitution and Her Majesty’s subjects.

You see Daniel I look at it like this, is there a law against it? Answer yes it’s the sedition and treason laws. Please don’t try and be cleaver and tell me Sedition has been repealed it hasn’t seditious libel has Sedition is Common Law and can’t be repealed by statute.

• Have those laws been broken? Answer yes. Big Time!
• Who broke them? Anthony Lynton Blair one time Prime Minister of this Kingdom.
• Nick Clegg Deputy Prime Minister of this Kingdom.
• David Cameron Prime Minister of this Kingdom.

Whose job is it to fix it? Well it’s the job of a little man with a black pointed hat on his head, and hand cuffs on his belt.

You see looked at like that its simple and I really like simple.
I feel sure that when you were at law school studying what little constitutional law they teach today in law school you would have been taught that parliament consisted of the Lords Spiritual, and the Lords Temporal sitting in the House of Peers, and the elected representatives sitting in the House of Commons, with the Queen sitting in the House of Peers.

You would have been taught the Commons originate legislation which then goes with its certificate to the House of Peers were it is vetted and accepted amended or rejected by the Peers, if amended it goes back to the Commons to be reviewed and if accepted it goes before the Queen unless a bill has passed through this process it cannot become law.

The House of Peers itself contains a number of Bishops whose job is to see that any proposed law fits in with the requirements of the teachings of the Church as established by law, a number of Judges also sit in the House of Peers their job is to see that any proposed law complies with the requirements of the Constitutional and Common Law of England. The Bishops and the Judges are life Peers the Lords Temporal are Hereditary Peers who are there because they or their ancestor has done something beneficial to the King or the Kingdom, with a sprinkling of life Peers appointed for reasons which today are highly suspect. If not downright corrupt. 

By removing the Hereditary Peers and the Law Lords along with the Bishops Anthony Lynton Blair has weakened the Upper House by removing 

(A)The Hereditary peers whose knowledge covered a large spectrum of the needs of this Kingdom

(B)The Bishops whose Job it is to look after the religious and moral welfare of the Kingdom.

(C)The Judges whose job is to look after the legal health of the Kingdom.

There is only one reason to do this hatchet Job on the House of Peers and that is to so weaken it that Clegg and Cameron can come along and get rid of the Upper House completely. Leaving just the House of Commons in complete control and us Her Majesty’s subjects exposed to despotic government. With no effective checks on what those in the Commons decide to do.

Each House of Parliament has a full cognisance as to (A) How it conducts its business and (B) Who sits in the House. If the House of Peers told the House of Commons they objected to a particular group say trade unionists sitting in the Commons, the Commons would quite rightly tell them to go paint their collective heads yellow and hide them in a corner somewhere. By what sleight of hand did Blair get the authority to remove the Hereditary Peers from the Upper House, NOT EVEN THE SOVEREIGN? HAS THAT RIGHT, NOT NOW AND NOT EVER.

Constitutionally no law will ever be legal the constitution is quite clear in the way parliament works, and the House of Commons without the House of Lords can never be a parliament. Of course once the Lords has gone the Queen is seriously isolated because the Peers are Her Majesty’s advisors how long before Clegg and Cameron and their band of cutthroats decide Her Majesty is surplus to requirements and remove her and her successors. By whose authority will that blood bath be started the people of these Islands love the Royals and will not lightly walk away from them.

The Constitutional Law on the construction of Parliament is laid down in law and the reasons for it are given in clear language, this is laid out in the second chapter of Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England Book One. You should know that if a law book is produced as evidence the judge will rule it inadmissible because he will determine the law, Blackstone’s Commentaries will be admitted as evidence of what the laws of England actually are.

Blair, Clegg, and Cameron are guilty of High Treason against the Constitution and People of this Her Majesty’s Kingdom. Your failure to act constitutes the Major Crimes at Common Law of Compounding High Treason with your Chief Constable, and individually Misprision of High Treason. There is considerable talk in this Kingdom of armed rebellion to return to Her Majesty the full use of all her prerogatives and to return to the rule of English Constitutional and Common Law. I have myself received anonymous information of city’s stockpiling arms ready for a rebellion, I have notified the Commissioner, I am at heart a police officer I believe in the rule of law, rebellion is a weapon of last resort which your actions have made more likely, the blood on the streets will be down to you, and when it has dried and the Kingdom is back in Her Majesty’s hands I have little doubt someone will come for you and your boss to stand trial before a jury of Englishmen. But that does not have to happen all we are asking is that you uphold the law as it is written no more and no less than that. The people of this Kingdom Her Majesty’s loyal subjects are talking about holding a lottery as to who is asked to be public executioner there are hundreds waiting to get a ticket.I do hope you and your boss are gambling men.Good luck


Albert Burgess

Cc Chief Constable