Albert Burgess

Those in government over us seem to feel that the laws of this country do not apply to them so much so that they break the law practically every time they speak. We have been aware of this for a number of years but the laws they are breaking at the moment are of such a nature that we can look the other way no longer. The Particular crimes we have taken a serious exception to are the subverting of the constitutional arraignments of parliament. In order to understand this it is necessary that you understand how our forefathers designed parliament with checks and balances designed to protect us.

 

Sir Mathew Hale Chief Justice of the Kings Bench in 1713 in his history of the Common Law of England describes Parliament as a tri-partite agreement with the House of Commons originating law, the House of Lords examining the proposed law and accepting amending or rejecting it depending on whether it is in the best interests of the subject and the Kingdom. It is the Common Law of England that each House has full cognisance as to who sits in it and how it conducts its business. Neither House can by the Common Law or Higher Law interfere in the business of the other House. In 1666 the House of Commons told the House of Lords they could not amend a money bill only accept it or reject it. In 1909 the government of Asquith put forward a budget part of which was designed to give every working man a pension, the Peerage believed the extra tax to fund this was too great for the working man to stand on top of the other tax he was already required to pay. The Peerage rejected the budget for that reason believing as it happens wrongly that they could not amend a money bill there is nothing in the constitution which prevents them carrying out such an amendment. Asquith told the House of Lords he was putting forward a bill to stop them rejecting a bill they could only hold it up for two years, the Lords said they would not pass this bill, and Asquith told them if they did not he would put 500 new Peers into the House who would vote for its abolition. The Peerage caved in and gave the 1911 Parliament Act the consent, Asquith then took it to King Edward VII who refused the Royal assent on the grounds it was unconstitutional and removed a protection from his subjects. The King shortly after fell ill with a recurring illness and died. King George V was met by a Government Minister who told him he keeps all his prerogatives but cannot use any of them without the approval of a Minister. This meant Asquith had usurped the Royal Authority into the hands of the House of Commons, the King gave the assent to the Parliament Act and in one fell swoop Asquith had neutered the House of Lords and committed High Treason by usurping the Royal Prerogative into his own hands. The subsequent 1949 Parliament Act reduced the time the House of Lords could hold up a bill to one year.
 
The 1999 House of Lords Act which removed all but 92 Hereditary Peers further undermined the House of Lords in favour of the House of Commons, this has further subverted the Constitutional arrangements for Parliament the major crime of Sedition at Common law, and at this level of Sedition an Act of High Treason against the English Constitution Queen Elizabeth II and the people of these Islands. Sedition is a common Law offence and all Common Law offences carry a preserved power of arrest for a Constable or any Person because of this any Person power or arrest Parliament cannot repeal any Common Law offences, because that would mean removing our Common Law duty imposed upon us as subjects to uphold the Common Law of England and Wales. Anthony Lynton Blair one time Prime Minster of this Kingdom by putting forward the 1999 House of Lords Act has committed the Major Crimes of Sedition at Common Law and High Treason against the Constitutional arraignments for the Government of this Her Majesty's United Kingdom of Great Britain.
 
With their plans to remove the House of Lords Completely and replace it with an Elected Senate, Nick Clegg Deputy Prime Minister, and David Cameron Prime Minister of this United Kingdom are fully and finally subverting the Constitutional arraignments of Parliament and by so doing are guilty of a Conspiracy to Subvert the Constitutional Arraignments of Parliament the Major Crime against the State of sedition at Common Law and at this level of Sedition an act of High Treason against the Constitutional arraignments of Parliament of this Her Majesty's United Kingdom Of Great Britain. 
 
David Cameron Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain by his privatisation plans for Her Majesty's Police Service is risking the immediate future of this Kingdom and Her Majesty's subjects purely because the Government has squandered this countries wealth on illegal wars and foreign aid to other countries and by giving a fortune every minute to the EU. his actions constitute the major crime of Misconduct in Public Office at Common Law.
 
It is at times like these that I regret being too old to hold a warrant Card, the making of an any person arrest is as you will appreciate fraught with danger. Which is why these arrests must be made by a serving Constable who can arrest on suspicion take them in for interview and carry out section 18 searches on their offices and homes for more evidence of their crimes you can also collect the relevant editions of Hansard Parliamentary Reports which will have covered the debates these criminals have contributed to. I hope you can understand that a thousand years of Constitutional Law can seem quite daunting but like all English Law it is very sensible legislation and Custom and Practice, and once you look at it it is remarkably simple to follow and understand. The one thing our Forefathers yours, and mine were not is stupid they did not make bad law.

Albert