On the below link is a letter I have sent today to Lincolnshire Police regarding Nick Clegg MP. Feel free to copy this and distribute far and wide, preferably sending your own version to your local Police Station.
According to a footnote by Sir William Blackstone in his Commentaries, in the early medieval period the only people who could read and write were usually monks, so a judge making his rounds would stop by the local monastery and requisition a cleric (= clerk) to keep record of the cases tried, parties involved, fines levied, etc. This worked great until the King and the Church got into a spat and the monks were forbidden to attend the King's court. But the courts were held so infrequently and attendance generally such a burden that the serfs and even the nobles would not tolerate many postponements. So the wigs and robes were worn by the important members of the court in order to obscure the fact that there was a monk in the courtroom. The wig hid his tonsure and the robe covered his habit. With the judge and bailiffs dressed likewise, he could not be identified simply by his appearance, and the fact that he was a monk meant that he would probably be unrecognised by anyone other than his brothers in the monastery or his immediate family.
Does this mean that any person wearing the said wig and clober is infact disguising themselves to fool the King and if so are they tresspassing? Are they acting as so did the Monk who should by common English law be immediately removed under order of the Monarch?
Just a thought and would be interesting to find out.
I have little idea of laws and constitutions etc however it has always suprised me that if people like yourself have this knowledge then why has nobody taken Heath, Major, Blair etc to court and won.
Why has nobody ever had them investigated for treason?
Hey there .. i am a musician singer/songwriter with my own commercial Pro tools studio set up based here in Hull / East Riding of Yorkshire, i would be most interested in either singing on this track or indeed working with some of my fantastic singers whom are already part of the BCG - please feel free to send me details and the track/lyrics so that i am able to produce what it is that you require.
I have just watched Mr Burgess' first video and he makes what seems to be a strong case.
But your Declaration is utterly amateur. Get a lawyer onto it. Cut out the whiffle about Her Majesty and focus on (what I take to be) your central point: that our membership of the EU is not founded on informed consent and so is not valid in law, particularly in view of constitutional implications that were not addressed at the time.
If Mr Burgess is correct, we are therefore not actually members of the EU now and have never been so, and no EU regulation or directive has any force in this country. In the absence of the express consent of the people, any Act of Parliament expressly or implicitly granting any power to the EU is ultra vires.
Get the thing properly worded, or you will have vitiated his efforts and doubtless attracted mild interest from the security services for nothing.
... and for God's sake get rid of the schlock background music and images. Burgess is convincing enough and you wouldn't have that am-dram special effects crap in court if he were giving evidence there.
... and it's "sovereign" not "soverien"
... and can you do something about the jew-haters (audience member in 2009 talk) and racists, Burgess' central argument is simply a constitutional one.
Considering the amount of random full stops instead of commas, and capital letters in the middle of sentences on wods that don't require capital letters, I'm surprised anyone proofread this.
This is a test comment. If you would like to share videos this can be done too.Files can also be uploaded, please speak to the web admin first
On the below link is a letter I have sent today to Lincolnshire Police regarding Nick Clegg MP. Feel free to copy this and distribute far and wide, preferably sending your own version to your local Police Station.
http://www.lincolnshireblog.com/blog1.php/2012/02/06/english-constitution-deputy-prime-minist
According to a footnote by Sir William Blackstone in his Commentaries, in the early medieval period the only people who could read and write were usually monks, so a judge making his rounds would stop by the local monastery and requisition a cleric (= clerk) to keep record of the cases tried, parties involved, fines levied, etc. This worked great until the King and the Church got into a spat and the monks were forbidden to attend the King's court. But the courts were held so infrequently and attendance generally such a burden that the serfs and even the nobles would not tolerate many postponements. So the wigs and robes were worn by the important members of the court in order to obscure the fact that there was a monk in the courtroom. The wig hid his tonsure and the robe covered his habit. With the judge and bailiffs dressed likewise, he could not be identified simply by his appearance, and the fact that he was a monk meant that he would probably be unrecognised by anyone other than his brothers in the monastery or his immediate family.
Does this mean that any person wearing the said wig and clober is infact disguising themselves to fool the King and if so are they tresspassing? Are they acting as so did the Monk who should by common English law be immediately removed under order of the Monarch?
Just a thought and would be interesting to find out.
Thanks for all your work Albert
I have little idea of laws and constitutions etc however it has always suprised me that if people like yourself have this knowledge then why has nobody taken Heath, Major, Blair etc to court and won.
Why has nobody ever had them investigated for treason?
'I always wondered why somebody didn't do something about that, then I realized I am somebody'
Hey there .. i am a musician singer/songwriter with my own commercial Pro tools studio set up based here in Hull / East Riding of Yorkshire, i would be most interested in either singing on this track or indeed working with some of my fantastic singers whom are already part of the BCG - please feel free to send me details and the track/lyrics so that i am able to produce what it is that you require.
Thanks
Dean: of the Marshall family
Hi Dean, thanks for this, could you drop me an e-mail on so I can give you the details & see what you think
Thanks
Rick
I have just watched Mr Burgess' first video and he makes what seems to be a strong case.
But your Declaration is utterly amateur. Get a lawyer onto it. Cut out the whiffle about Her Majesty and focus on (what I take to be) your central point: that our membership of the EU is not founded on informed consent and so is not valid in law, particularly in view of constitutional implications that were not addressed at the time.
If Mr Burgess is correct, we are therefore not actually members of the EU now and have never been so, and no EU regulation or directive has any force in this country. In the absence of the express consent of the people, any Act of Parliament expressly or implicitly granting any power to the EU is ultra vires.
Get the thing properly worded, or you will have vitiated his efforts and doubtless attracted mild interest from the security services for nothing.
... and for God's sake get rid of the schlock background music and images. Burgess is convincing enough and you wouldn't have that am-dram special effects crap in court if he were giving evidence there.
... and it's "sovereign" not "soverien"
... and can you do something about the jew-haters (audience member in 2009 talk) and racists, Burgess' central argument is simply a constitutional one.
You are a blessing to us all, our good man. Thank you for all you time and energy :)
Boy that's 10 X more interesting than school! Thanks Albert!
Considering the amount of random full stops instead of commas, and capital letters in the middle of sentences on wods that don't require capital letters, I'm surprised anyone proofread this.
And just who proofread yours??? WORDS is not spelt WODS! Pots and kettles spring to mind.